The President of the Higher Audiovisual Council takes a stand against the idea of reconciliation of the APF and Arcep, the telecoms regulator.
LE FIGARO. – Do you support the appointment of a government commissioner in the CSA as envisaged in Arcep?
Michel BOYON. – The question will never be relevant! Certainly, there are commissioners of the government with independent authorities such as the Commission or the Energy Regulatory Authority of competition. For the CSA, which is the guarantor of civil liberties and fundamental respect for pluralism in broadcasting, it would be simply absurd.
What is your position on a rapprochement between Arcep, the CSA and the Agency of frequencies?
This subject is often poorly addressed.There is a tendency in France to focus on approaches by the structures and organizations, so that what counts is the strategies and objectives. You can not play Lego with institutions that have declared their independence, demonstrated their competence, acquired their legitimacy. In our country, the park is well managed Frequency: CSA and Arcep actively participate and work together on such topics as the dividend or digital TV on the move. This cooperation was highlighted three years ago in the plan "France numérique 2012". But remember that the CSA has a great originality. It is a regulator of content, only in France, and whoever has the most power in Europe and worldwide.When he assigns a frequency to a radio or television, it does for a given program, in exchange for free use of the frequency, it requires a chain of obligations that it ensures. The heart of activity Arcep, however, are the competition issues related to networks. Nothing has been said in recent days about the relationship between the two institutions does not bother me. But if some wanted in this way restrict the regulation of audiovisual content, it would be unacceptable.
How the CSA can regulate Internet content?
There is a complete – European directive, law, decree, Proceedings of the CSA – to regulate Internet services business of video on demand. What is not regulated, it is the content posted by individuals on video-sharing sites.Yet it is they who raise the most difficulties in terms of child welfare, dignity of the person or racism and antisemitism. With the TV connected, their impact will intensify. The only course of action today is the referral of a judge. It is very inadequate. We must organize a true co-regulation, starting with strengthening the signaling device, which is not used enough. It should also establish a code of ethics involving publishers and hosts, including the protection of young people, and could lead to a label given by the CSA. We could go further by calling for parental control software filters sites that would not have this label. Finally, the CSA could be empowered to order the withdrawal of illegal programs and even have a power to impose penalties for repeat offenders. For this, we need a law.There is no question that the Internet is a zone of lawlessness with respect to our core values. It is an important topic that transcends borders and I hope that at the next G8 summit, some time will be spent.
Can we settle the issue of Net neutrality amendment by a simple?
The CSA is obviously very attached to Net neutrality. It would be unacceptable to the radio or television suffer from discriminatory choices made by operators, especially based on financial criteria. If we did not warranty this subject, a strong law is needed.
How do you approach the arrival of the connected TV in France?
A year ago, when we talked TVs connected, we never thought to see happen so fast. This is progress for the viewer, but we must anticipate the consequences would be negative.My first fear is that a disruption of the balance of an entire economic sector. For example, publishers of free channels will see their audience is more fragmented, while a portion of advertising revenue will be diverted to the search engines. Furthermore, the connected TV will reduce the role of commercial distributors. French services for video on demand will experience a distortion of competition in foreign service, or hacking video sharing sites. In total, support for the French production is no longer guaranteed as it relies on the sales channels and its components – investment obligations, broadcasting quotas, chronology of media exclusives – would be threatened. It is urgent to make proposals on the subject.The CSA has decided to organize this international symposium next April 28.
Digital radio can it lie fallow?
The CSA has done what the law required it by setting the frequencies and selecting candidates. But the crisis came and blocked the entire device. I am concerned about the reluctance of some operators. Eventually, the radio will not be satisfied with the frequency modulation and long wave. But I think the Internet can only be a supplement to a radio broadcast. Large stations should understand that their brands may wane amid tens of thousands of radio stations broadcast on the Net. Finally, as Chairman of the CSA, I can accept that 30% of French people have access to only ten stations over the air.I rely heavily on the report that the Prime Minister has asked David Kessler.
The personal mobile TV is still not launched in France. Why?
There was a tremor with the initiative of Virgin Mobile, and TDF. Unfortunately, the application of the VAT increase offerings of mobile operators broke the momentum. I urge that this be deferred for three or four years.
When will you launch the tender for two new DTT channels?
As soon as possible. But this launch is subject to the intervention of an order to finance the redevelopment of frequencies to provide the necessary space for two multiplexes that will host the new channels. Must be made before the decree on April 30.